January 11, 2008
I had heard of the term ‘chemtrails’ years ago, but dismissed the idea as too “far out” to be believable. But I began to notice something in my photographs, a disturbing trend. All of the photographs that included the sky had multiple large contrails in them. So I began to watch the sky, and photograph these lines. (http://annetteafarr.photium.com/cloud)
Sometimes small white lines dotted the sky, other days a spider web of toxic clouds clotted the horizon. Usually four or five planes would work together, turning their ‘aerosol switches’ on and off as needed, sometimes trying to disguise their operations. These are not random actions by these white, unmarked C-130s, but seem to have an objective, even changing their distribution patterns day by day, depending on the weather.
Reports from all over the globe tell us this is happening over big cities as well as very rural areas.
These contrails appear differently, in their looks and actions, from the regular ice-forming contrails we’ve seen in the past. These ‘special clouds’ are quickly blown by winds into a feathery white haze that spreads and persists for hours. They begin early in the morning and work all day making these cirrus-aviaticus clouds that would stretch out and grow in size, covering the sky and obscuring the sun by late afternoon.
Some of these jets would work in tandem producing parallel lines, others would curve through the first straight aerosol trail in a back and forth S-shaped curve. If it is a cloudless day, they make short lines; on and off. Other times they are blatant and make lots of lines miles long, coming back only to fill in the last bit of blue hole left in the sky (http://bariumblues.com/chemtrail_ca…) .
Regular contrails are emitted from airplane engines as condensation from water droplets. Chem-trailings emanate from beneath the wings or from the tails of these specially-equipped jets. These chemtrails have a distinct fingerprint – small white puffs, or balls of chemicals which ‘hang’ from the tailings. This is the defining characteristic of ‘chemtrails’, the additives are heavier than the air and ‘drip’ from the contrail. They have the ability to persist in the atmosphere for up to 8 hours.
Chemical ingredients in conventional jet fuel spray include kerosene, nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, soot particulate, carbon monoxide, and toxins such as benzene and formaldehyde (http://www.rense.com/general27/qoes.htm) . Due to the inclusion of silver dioxide or highly carcinogenic ethylene dibromide to the spray, a refractory halo called ‘sundogs’ or small ‘chembows’ will form within the haze, like oil on water.
A US study found jet fuel contaminates in 100% of lactating mothers’ breast milk, and some infants getting ten times the ‘safe’ limit of perchlorate, another additive, which adversely affects brain and thyroid function. See http://www.ewg.org/node/8205?gclid=…
Chemtrail particulate was reportedly tested by independent citizens and stated to contain barium (possibly BaTIO3), aluminum, bacteria, dessicated erythrocytes, molds, fungi/mycoplasma, isotopes, and a strange bio-filament that resembles spider webbing. The barium content has been tested at eight times the ‘safe limit’ of human exposure which affects immune function, metabolic resistance to intake of potassium, respiratory illnesses, gastrointestinal system issues, as well as environmental changes (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okB-…) .
There are a few main conjectures as to why this is happening, and by whom since the US Air Force labels this a ‘hoax’ despite our own eyes, and the EPA refuses to analyze the particulates that have been found. Remember the assertion by the administration back in 2001, that terrorists had plans to spray us with biochemicals from small planes? Unfortunately, government agencies and the media, who should be our frontline of defense, are silent or dis-informing.
Marcus Dalton of the Las Vegas Tribune writes:
“Congressman Dennis Kucinich of Ohio authored the Space Preservation Act of 2001, which sought a “permanent ban against weapons in space,” specifically banning “chemtrails” as weapons. But in a subsequent version of the bill, the “chemtrails” language disappeared entirely. The missing words suggest an eyes-wide-open denial, which says as much about the cover-up as it does about the spraying that’s plainly visible in the sky.” (http://www.fas.org/sgp/congress/200…)
In a front-page story, the Akron Beacon Journal noted that Kucinich’s bill “had been rewritten and the references to chemtrails and the other types of weapons were quietly eliminated.” The Beacon Journal article linking chemtrails to conspiracies resulted from massive local pressure. Michel Massullo of Akron provided that newspaper with rolls of photos of plane trails and a sworn affidavit attesting to extensive aerial activity over that city.”
The first hypothesis is weather control and mitigation. The assertion is that this is a way of mitigating global warming by reflecting solar heat back into space off clouds with metallic salts, but pilot operations have been seen to continue during the evenings. Another postulate is control of continental water supplies. Aerial pollutants actually cause a reduction in the amount of rainfall since haze can cut rain rates in half. Drought and lowered water tables are reported in most of the US. The large X’s in the sky are believed to be placed strategically to allow for satellite tracking of drift and dispersion.